So Obama is willing to bankrupt the country and destroy the economy with his limitless spending, but he's willing to associate with Tony Rezko to get a corrupt land deal? Sure, Rezko is a convicted felon, but he's a convicted felon NOW, not when Barry Obama knew him. He's outlived his usefulness, like Jeremiah Wright.

He can spend us into oblivion and redistribute wealth, but he's perfectly willing to hire a laundry list of tax cheats to his cabinet. Timothy Geithner, Nancy Killefer, Tom Daschle and even Rahm "I'm a ballerina and I also poke people whilst naked in a shower" Emanuel have had tax issues. After they're caught, they somehow realize it was all a mistake and quickly pay. Some withdraw their names from consideration. I wonder if the administration would be so lenient with you or I, or any conservative. Liberals want massive taxes, but they don't want to pay their own. They want YOU to do it. They are the elites, they don't feel they have to pay taxes, even though big dummy Joe Biden says it's everyone's "patriotic duty". Is he too busy uttering racial slurs to realize we ALL ALREADY pay our taxes? By "we" I mean American citizens, of course.

Obama made over 7 million dollars last year and he gives his daughters one dollar a week allowance and no birthday presents. "The party is expensive enough" is their excuse. Obama has never run a business or even worked in a business. He's never met a payroll or even seen a payroll. But he knows, O wise and great all-knowing master that he is, how to spend your money better than you do. He's a real whiz with taxes. And liberals can't use the old "he's surrounded himself with great people" excuse (non-applicable to Republicans, of course) because the "people he's surrounded himself with" are all tax cheats.

In non money related issues, in Obama's world, it's perfectly okay to be pals with weather underground terrorists who bombed the Capitol, the Pentagon and New York City Police headquarters, but when it comes to abortion, he wouldn't want his daughters "punished with a baby", and he voted multiple times AGAINST the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, which would protect babies born and breathing outside the mother's womb due to a botched abortion. To recap: with terrorists, the attitude is "let's be friends!" With innocent babies struggling to survive, the attitude is "F*** You!" Classy. Let's re-elect him.

One more thing for today: With the Arizona illegal immigration controversy, he takes the side of the illegals. With the New Black Panther Party case, his justice department refused to prosecute. With the Henry Louis Gates story, before knowing the facts, he broadcast to the world "The Cambridge police acted stupidly". And now he's in favor of the Ground Zero Mosque. But we mustn't question his views on race, because he dutifully sat in the pews of Reverend Wright's church for twenty years. "Now that's MY kind of racism!" (possible new campaign slogan idea).

Every day liberals change and set the tone of what "racism" now is, mainly to hurt their Conservative opponents. Obama can cherry-pick the racism he deems acceptable to his palate that day. People in Arizona fighting to protect themselves against foreign murderers? Booooo! Jeremiah Wright? Yayyyyyy!

2012 can't come fast enough....

Conservatives believe in the greatness and power of America. Yes, there are flaws here but it seems all of human experience is based on correcting those flaws - and this is one of the foundations that conservatism is based upon. In short, conservatives see and recognize problems and try to fix them. Liberals whine when their vision of utopian perfection isn't there and then they call you a racist.

Liberals promise and promise and promise utopia. They are a bunch of snake oil salesmen, banking on bamboozling the public by constantly lying to them, seeing the American people as nothing more than pawns and idiots.  If liberalism is so great, how come none of their pie in the sky ideals have come to fruition? How come we're not basking in their utopia?

Because we haven't surrendered enough of our liberty, freedom, money and private property TO THEM? So they keep on lying and promising...because they haven't stolen enough of what makes you special. To them, the private sector is nothing more than a middling annoyance that they hope can be done away with someday by raising taxes higher and higher on small and large businesses, making them impossible to function...unless the government gets involved.

Obama claimed he was going to be "post-racial", that his administration would have "transparency", that there would be "hope and change", that "taxes wouldn't rise for 95% of working Americans", "unemployment won't rise above eight percent", and that "winged unicorns will fly majestically over the rainbow". To be fair and balanced, that last one may have come true.

Seeing as they can't run on their record, as it, of course, is a dismal failure (these supposedly smart ivy-leaguers should have learned that communism and socialism have never worked, anywhere in the world, ever. But they hang stubbornly on, because it would kill them to have an epiphany and realize that their entire belief system is a lie), they are simply going to lazily kick back and rest on their favorite old canard - calling those that disagree with the "fundamental transformation of America" a racist.

To them, the race card isn't a card anymore, it's more like the Olive Garden endless salad and breadsticks. It's easy, convenient, cheap, never ends and is highly comforting to them.

The Obama presidency, vomited upon us by know-nothing 18 year olds who gullibly believed the hype and bought into the new product, like a new iPod or Blackberry, MUST be a one-term failed experiment. How could they, or anyone besides those paying attention, have known he would spend more money than any human being in history and recklessly and irresponsibly put us TRILLIONS of dollars in debt, so future generations are born with it the second they come out of the womb?

The next president, to paraphrase Mark Levin, should put forward a one-sentence bill (as opposed to the 3000 page bills that Democrats vote to pass but don't read) - "This hereby repeals the entire Obama agenda". Genius.

Obama is the most anti-Israel president in American history. That includes his forebear, Jimmy Carter. I posted my first, and at the time I figured it would be the only, blog on this subject on June 18, 2009. And it had been brewing in my mind for quite a while before that. But, sadly, the Anti-Semite has “struck again”.

The Obama administration have given more scrutiny to Israeli families building apartments in which to live than they have to Iran building a nuclear weapon. It’s clear Obama sees Israel more as an obstacle to his lovefest with the surrounding countries than as our only ally in that area of the world.

Because team Obama, at the very least, disapproves of Jewish construction in East Jerusalem, he snubbed what should be a powerful friend of the U.S., Benjamin Netanyahu on his recent trip to Washington. According to Newsmax, “The White House denied Netanyahu the red carpet treatment generally afforded to visiting heads of state.
The Israeli prime minister and Obama didn’t pose for photos together, and Netanyahu was excluded from dinner with the president Tuesday night.” Also according to Newsmax, Obama left a meeting with Netanyahu, and: “One Israeli newspaper called the meeting 'a hazing in stages,' conducted in such an adversarial environment that the Israeli delegation eventually left, worried that their White House phone conversations were being bugged.”

Further illustrating the general tenor and feeling of what must be going on in the white house, on Monday, April 25th, U.S. National Security adviser James Jones, while speaking at the 25th anniversary celebration for the Washington Institute of Near East Policy, told an off-color Jewish joke. Where did he get the sense that that was appropriate?

Ed Koch is also angry at Obama, stating: “It is one thing to disagree with certain policies of the Israeli government. It is quite another to treat Israel and its prime minister as pariahs, which only emboldens Israel's enemies and makes the prospect of peace even more remote.” and “I have not heard or read statements criticizing the president by New York Senators Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand or many other supporters of Israel for his blatantly hostile attitude toward Israel and his discourtesy displayed at the White House. President Obama orchestrated the hostile statements of Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, voiced by Biden in Israel and by Clinton in a 43-minute telephone call to Bibi Netanyahu, and then invited the latter to the White House to further berate him”.

However, Chuck Schumer has voiced his anger and disappointment at Obama’s treatment of Israel, yet another Democrat to do so. According to the New York Daily News, “The staunch supporter of Israel says President Obama  shouldn't have scolded Israel for approving 1,600 new Jewish housing units in the Arab half of the divided city.” and “Schumer first voiced his anger at the Obama administration for siding with the Palestinians during a radio show on Jewish affairs on Thursday.

'You have to show Israel that it's not going to be forced to do things it doesn't want to do and can't do,' Schumer told host Nachum Segal.”

Last Sunday, thousands of Protesters congregated outside the Israeli consulate, displaying their anger and displeasure over the Obama administration’s treatment of Israel.
States Beth Gilinsky of the Jewish Action Alliance. "Vast segments of the Jewish community will not tolerate the President's continuing attacks on Israel. Grassroots Jewry will not be silent."

Obama has called the terrorist organization Hamas, who has expressed its desire to destroy Israel, a legitimate part of the peace process. Iran funds Hamas and Hezbollah, and the talks with Iran continue on and on. Contrast that with the way Israel has been treated. Why does the holocaust-denying madman of Iran, who has stated openly he wants to "wipe Israel off the map" get so much leeway, and Israel so little? I guess we’re all just supposed to believe Obama harbors none of the Anti-Jewish sentiment of his mentor Reverend Wright. Sure, he chose to sit, and continue sitting,  in the pews for over 20 years but none of that sank in.

Obama keeps pressuring and needling Israel to give up more and more and more land. They’ve already conceded so much, but that’s not enough for the Anti-Semite.

So on Thursday, April 15th, I attended my first Tea Party event. It was a buzzing hive of WHITE, RACIST, evil hatemongers doing all the horrible, despicable things those evil, WHITE, RACIST hatemongers do. I was shocked and appalled. There's just one other thing...

JUST KIDDING!!!!! Of course, what I wrote above is a JEST. I'm mocking what the media, and the media alone, mistakenly perceives the Tea Party movement to be. But if I'm lucky, maybe NBC or some loony left-wing blog (basically the same thing at this point) will take me out of context. Maybe I'll get my own show on MSNBC.

What the April 15th event TRULY was, was a beautiful event, an outpouring of concern about excessive taxation, and excessive spending by the current regime. What especially struck me was the honesty and sincerity of it all. No one was paying these people to be there. These were real people with honest concerns and fears.

It's not complicated. Lots of parents were there with their kids, there were many senior citizens, and people dressed as older patriots (George Washington) and newer ones (Sarah Palin), and people held up their signs and flags. The media was there and some people gave interviews. The weather could not have been better, and it was right on Long Wharf, so the view of Long Island sound made for a beautiful backdrop to it all. Republican candidates from across the state got up to the podium and gave short 5-10 minute speeches, one after the other so it never got boring. Peter Schiff made the best impression on me, but all the speakers had their own charm. At the end, they dumped the tea in the water. That's about it.

One of the best things was the energy of the crowd and a sense of positivism, especially in the face of adversity. As opposed to the bitter, angry, hate-filled anti-Bush protesters who became heroes of the corrupt, biased media. Just imagine the total opposite. The event was totally peaceful, even serene. Some people even lay down in the grass and children were playing. Contrast that with WTO protesters smashing windows and causing all sorts of havoc. Guess who became the righteous, lionized defenders of truth in the eyes of the media...

Therein lies a crucial point. Anti-Bush protesters protested based upon their opinions of President Bush. Tea Party protesters are protesting based on established economic facts. But God forbid if there is one kook at a Tea Party rally. Even though that is bound to happen in any large gathering of human beings, suddenly the kook represents the entire movement in the eyes of the corrupt media.

Speaking of NBC, they continually pound the drum that the Tea Party movement -- yes, the WHOLE movement -- is, everybody say it together now - RACIST (of course), nothing could be further from the truth. That time-honored old canard is trotted out because they have nothing legitimate to attack the Tea Partiers with, so they made up that charge out of whole cloth. It is a blatant lie, a shameful attempt to stop the momentum of the Tea Party movement. I was actually there, as opposed to some that are making that absurd charge, and I saw nothing even remotely "racist". I think everyone knows that if someone slips up or says something accidentally, it could be taken out of context. Bush protesters could say the most vile, disgusting things imaginable and never had to walk on eggshells. But the group that simply wants government accountability, lower taxes, and limited, Constitutional government are denigrated and not the media darlings that the Bush haters were (and are).

Interestingly, there were a few anti-Tea Party protesters in attendance, though the police kept them across the street. Why anyone would be FOR gigantic government, deficit spending and massive, punitive taxation, I'm not exactly sure. No matter how good an idea is, there will always be someone who is against it. It has been that way since the beginning.

I would encourage anyone reading this to look into their local Tea Party and see what events they have planned. It's a fun way to get educated about the abject failure of liberal policies.

If you are reading this, first, God bless you, but secondly, nothing I'm going to say here you will find original. But it is scary.

Is it at all surprising that a man who has close friends and associates that are admitted communists, socialists and TERRORISTS and comes from a radical, ultra-left background would purposely spend trillions and trillions of dollars in an effort to destroy wealth and create a socialist utopia where everyone is "equal" and "social justice" has finally been achieved? There, sadly, is such a man. A poor, misguided soul who is arrogant enough to believe he can achieve this heinous goal in America. An arrogant, dangerous, inexperienced left-wing radical idealogue named Barack Hussein Obama.

Hyper-inflation? Never heard of it! We can spend and print as much money as we want! I'm Barack Obama! People "fainted" at my speeches! Surely my words, empty as they are except of lies, will be enough to assuage those sheep, the American people!

The above is how I imagine the man thinks, if he thinks about this stuff at all. Far, FAR more corrupt and nefarious than that scapegoat of the left, George W. Bush ever could be, Obama gets a pass from the media because they agree with his nutty left-wing assumptions about the world. They also happened to disagree with Bush's. So the anointed one gets pass after pass.

He's lied about:
- Having lobbyists in his administration
- Unemployment not going above 8 percent
- The "stimulus" package actually working
- Not taking earmarks
- Closing Guantanamo Bay
- Broadcasting his backroom deals and bribery on C-SPAN
- The recent supreme court decision about corporate financing of elections
- Illegal aliens and abortion not being covered by ObamaCare

...Among other things, and the results in New Jersey, Massachusetts and Virginia are a rebuke to his radicalism, but he refuses to see that because he is too blinded by his ideology. What with this insane spending, combined with his giving constitutional rights, privileges and civilian trials to the 9/11 killers he is incredibly dangerous. I can't tell if he knows it or is just blundering through under the murky cloud of his liberalism, but the result is the same: Extreme danger for the USA.

To him, global warming is a bigger threat than terror. The incompetent Janet "The System Worked" Napolitano said Caucasian veterans are who they are closely looking at as being the bad guys. How insulting, insane and backwards can you be? The very people protecting us from terror are this administrations' enemy? We've got a big problem here.

Why should enemy combatants that are not American citizens, that hate America and want to torture and kill every American, Every Jew and Christian they can by any means they can, that hate everything about us and our way of life and will never stop trying to destroy it, why should they be afforded the same rights and privileges a loyal American would get? NO ONE in the Obama administration has explained, can explain, or will explain this to the American people, simply because it's not possible, not to mention constitutional.

And to anyone who, for some reason, approves of all this excessive, unnecessary and wasteful spending, I would ask, "Why is it worth it to you that your children, your children's children, and probably THEIR children will be working off this debt their whole lives, living a degraded quality of life because they are living under a mountain of excessive taxation from the moment they are born? Why? So a radical who narrowly snuck his way into the White House can promote some sort of unconstitutional agenda? Why is that okay? What gives him the right?" Aren't future generations supposed to be BETTER off than the previous one? Why take risks with your money? Why invest? Why make bold moves, trying to come up with products, goods and services that can benefit mankind? The government just keeps making that harder and harder, making everyone's dreams farther and farther out of reach. And why? Because Barry hates rich people, even though he himself is rich? I guess we can add hypocrite to his list of attributes. How's that Obama vote workin' out for ya?

Of course, he did promise one thing that is turning out to be true: "change". We're changing all right. Decidedly for the worse.

Liberals can't win arguments because they only have one idea - their best, most triumphant, most transcendent idea: RAISE TAXES. That's it. That's all they've got. There are no more arrows in their quiver. Every liberal so-called "idea" comes back to raising taxes. Because they are so generous with other people's money.

But it's perfect for them because it's so incredibly arrogant. They know SO much better than you how to spend your money. They are so much SMARTER. You are just another simpleton, a sheep that doesn't understand how perfect life would be if you just gave more of  your hard-earned money to entitlement programs to create their socialist utopia.

But who really is simple-minded here? The answer to every liberal challenge is, phrased one way or another, a curt "raise taxes". Politicians and liberals suck up to Castro and they can't hide their jealousy. They seem to want to get us closer and closer to communism.
Pelosi and Reid's approval ratings -if you can still call them that- are in the low twenties, because they are so hopelessly out of touch with the American people. Now Pelosi is floating around the idea of a VAT tax? Do politicians not pay taxes (Except for Obama staffers)? Why don't they care more about this, even for their own lives?

You can only raise taxes so many times before the people get angry. Look at the tea party protesters. Also, if you want someone to do less of something, tax it more. Make it more expensive, more out of reach. Yet liberals think this is a good idea. Despite the fact that it has never worked anywhere in the world, and every time taxes are cut, economies thrive. But facts never trouble liberals. They just think if they take more and more and more money out of YOUR paycheck, problems, somehow, despite no evidence, will solve themselves.

So next time you hear the song "Taxman" by the Beatles, written by George Harrison, think about how in England in the late 60's, how ahead of the curve they were, again. As bad as things were there, and probably still are, they never could have predicted Pelosi, Reid and Obama gunning to tax soda and candy to nickel and dime us out of everything we have and still expect us to approve.

As we all know, liberals throw around the charge "racism" like rice at a wedding. I maintain this is because never in their lives have they seen actual racism. They just think they see it, hair-triggering at easy, perceived targets without any thought. Like overzealous hunters who have been in the woods for days and WANT to see a deer so badly they start mentally manufacturing them: "Oh! I see one! I see one!" when they are clearly not there. Liberals have co-opted the term (something they are experts at; rather than think through an argument, they just co-opt terms), "racism". I guess they figured they used it so much, why not? Now, in the year 2009, the word racism does not mean what it used to mean. It now means "someone a liberal disagrees with".

Take the sad case of former President Jimmy Carter. (That feels so odd to write). He and his ilk are running around saying if you dare, if you DARE to disagree with, question, or just want some clarification on The Anointed One's murky policies, you, of course, of course, of course a million times, are...wait for it...a RACIST!!!!!!! They finally GOT one! Alert the media! No, they are already on high alert.

There are so many things wrong with this line of thinking it's hard to know where to start. I'll run down a few of the most obvious. The following is by no means a complete list.

1. Consider the source. This is coming from JIMMY CARTER. Why is everyone stopping what they are doing to listen to the worst president in history (to date...we've got someone anxiously following his great model now). Liberals, obviously longing for the days of gas lines, high unemployment and inflation and hostage crises, are slavishly taking notes as their guru spouts his wisdom.

2. Carter himself could genuinely be charged with racism, in the form of anti-Semitism. His policies regarding Israel and the Jews have been abhorrent, and from his presidency well into the present day, he hasn't stopped hating the Jews and railing against the state of Israel. Maybe that's why Carter is so in tune with the notion of racism. Takes one to know one.

3. During the campaign, we never stopped hearing admonitions of "If we don't elect Obama, the country is racist". Well, we elected him. That wasn't enough. We're still racist. The shouters during the 2008 presidential campaign never mentioned that at the time. See, that's what liberals do. They are constantly changing their standard. No one can measure up. They're so busy crying "racism" all the time they've forgotten what it means. I hope an actual racist never comes along. They'd be the boy who cried racist.

4. Obama is half black and half white. That never enters into the racist-accuser's agenda. Besides being totally against his policies, I'm also against his white half. (?) But, you know, being racist against whites is A-OK in their book. It never even occurred to them.

5. And finally, my trump card. According to the idiots without a coherent argument, if you are against Obama's policies, you are a racist. By that logic -- following their OWN logic -- we have to LIKE everything he does solely because of his race. Isn't THAT a racist policy? Preferring someone because of their race is racism. I just get the idea that Carter doesn't really even know his policies all that well. But if you dare to be against them, you are automatically graded "racist" like beef is graded "A". You know, with a big, immediate stamp. They only do that because they like to think there is no comeback to that. There is. The truth.

In the 4th Century BC, Hippocrates wrote "First do no harm". When he originally wrote his famous oath, he couldn't possibly have ever imagined he would be contending with Obama, Pelosi and the Democrats.

Democrats won't be subject to the same system of health care that they propose the rest of the country use. That's because the official seal of  the liberal is a picture of a weasel with the words in Latin, "Do as I say, not as I do". The life of a liberal is one that is constantly fighting against common sense. This uphill, against-the-stream conflict is why they love being a liberal so much. They love that conflict. It's a psychological problem, we all know. If some people have no conflicts in their lives, they artificially create some, like young people and celebrities that have nothing but time and expendable income on their hands. They psychologically feel guilty about this, so they become liberal to try and absolve their perceived "sins", so they start "caring" about global warming and minorities, on a surface level of course.

Rather than engage the American public and simply explain why socialized medicine is a good idea, they call average Americans with valid questions at these townhall meetings a litany of classic liberal slurs, such as the all-time, #1 classic "racist", followed closely by #2 on their delusional hit parade, "nazi". Also thrown at hardworking, honest citizens, "KKK", "Timothy McVeigh", "Astroturf", "Unamerican", and "Angry Mob".
I would say that he who starts the name calling has lost the debate, but the Democrats never debated in the first place. They went from zero-to-hurling insults. Because they know their supposed "plan", which has failed in every country its been tried in, ever, throughout time, has, in fact, failed. Just like every other liberal idea. Even Hillary Clinton tried it in the mid-90's. But now we're in a recession, so their brilliant plan is to revive a failed concept that costs trillions of dollars. And then insult the people that simply want our elected representatives to read the bills they write. Way to go, Democrats.

And speaking of name-calling and baseless, unfair accusations, for the past 8 years (not to mention every day since Vietnam, but let's stay on target here) we've heard nothing but the most hysterical, insane Bush-bashing imaginable, calling him every name in the book, including the classic favorites "nazi" and "satan". Did we hear a PEEP out of the Democrats? ANY WORD about the inappropriateness of any of it? Of course not. That's in eight years. In one month of valid questions about our health and life and death from everyday citizens, out come the insults, "nazi", "Swastikas", "KKK", "Timothy McVeigh", etc. Absolutely disgusting.
 
So we're all supposed to start shaking in our shoes when Democrats call the town hall protesters an "angry mob". Never mind that their corrupt, incompetent, ideologically backward and unfathomably expensive so-called "plan" is what made people angry in the first place. But nothing's ever their fault. It's our fault for being angry at their ugly proposals (bureaucrats deciding who lives and who dies, rationing for people with cancer, assuming the cancer will wait to spread, deciding elderly Americans are "expendable", etc.) I guess we shouldn't be angry at all. Sorry Democrats. Our bad. Your wisdom is all-encompassing. We forgot.
I say, YES, we ARE an angry mob! We should be proud about that and wear it like a badge of honor! If Democrats see us like that, then I say stand up and be PROUD to be an angry mob! Considering what they want to do to this country, it's downright civil. Look at it in perspective. But that's never been the strong point of the liberal, the same people that wanted to ram this bill down our throats in a matter of weeks. I wonder why they wanted to do it so fast...if not to build a state where they have eventual complete control of our lives, bit by bit by bit.

With their obsession with abortion rights, and their obsession with socialized medicine, liberals are gunning for the ultimate control of the American people: they want to decide who is born and who dies. Once again, THEY know much better than YOU. From their bubble, you're just a stupid, unwashed simpleton and they are our wise, all-knowing leaders. Clearly not satisfied with all the damage they've wreaked on the nation in their embarrassing history (they call it "change you can believe in"), now liberals have a figurehead with the massive, gargantuan arrogance to assume Americans are all clamoring for a government bureaucrat to tell them what medicine they need and what doctors they can and can't go to.

What Barry obviously does NOT understand is that freedom and capitalism are the things that made America the world's greatest superpower in 233 short years. Not socialism, communism, statism and collectivism. Those are concepts foreign to America, and trying to artificially impose them on this country is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. It won't work, it can't work, and if it's such a brilliant idea, how come it hasn't worked yet? I mean, they are rushing, rushing, rushing to pass their liberal spending bills as fast as humanly possible. How come we're not basking in the socialist utopia yet?

So all along, the cure-all to all of society's ills is just to rob the money from those evil, dastardly "rich people". If we could only just impose PUNITIVE taxation on society's successes, the world could all join hands and sing like in that Coke commercial. Oh, Mr. Obama you are just so SMART! How has human civilization gotten along this far without your magic?
Needless to say, "rob from the achievers and give to the lazy" just won't cut it. Never mind that the so-called rich already pay incredibly high taxes, Never mind that they create jobs and invest money, which, of course, helps the economy. It's just so unbelievably infantile in its thinking. It seems like an idea a child in elementary school would have: "just take the money from rich people". It's so babyish, and so lacking in complexity and common sense, I suppose it's not hard to believe it's the best idea liberals have.

What The Minions fail to understand (that's what I call Barry, Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd, etc.) is that every American could give 100% of their income to the Government -- ALL of it -- and it STILL wouldn't be enough to fund their half-baked, simple-minded liberal fantasy list. They seem to have no problem with the fact that children that haven't even been born yet are going to help shoulder the burden of their totally irresponsible spending. Future generations should inherit a better world than the previous one. They shouldn't be born into a life of indentured servitude with a lower quality of life just for coming out of the womb in post-Obama America.
This is so unfair to future generations it's just maddening. Don't liberals have a conscience? But I suppose less people will be "punished with a baby" as Barry himself said, and his reputation as a hater and destroyer of wealth, and someone who lowers all of our quality of life in pursuit of an unattainable liberal dream, will be assured.

I hate to break it to anyone who may be reading this, but our all-wise, all-seeing, all-knowing messiah, our golden boy who can do no wrong, Barack Hussein Obama, is an anti-semite.
I don't mean to say he is a proactively violent man, but his entire life since he was a child, he has been stewing in anti-white, anti-Israel, antisemitic rhetoric vis-a-vis his nonstop associations with radicals since his childhood. He has soaked up their views like a sponge, and he almost can't HELP be victim to their left-wing lies and harbor their views as well.

Start with his overly vehement denial that he is a Muslim, until it became politically expedient to do so. Not that there is anything wrong with being Muslim, millions of people are. But not so to B. Hussein Obama. I think that is because HIS vision of being Muslim, the way HE knows it to be, is automatically anti-Israel, and he just assumed other people would think that too, and he must have worried it would jeopardize the Jewish vote, or other votes. Never mind that his assumptions are largely false, but the left-wing anti-Israel sentiment was ingrained too deep in his personal upbringing to see that.

Going along in the mode of "now that I've been elected it's okay to discuss my Muslim roots and middle name", his speech in Cairo was a template of classic liberal moral equivalency. What he basically said was "Hamas SHOULD stop using violence against Israelis (and undoubtedly will listen to me, the wise one), but those naughty Israelis should also stop trying to live their lives."

Writer Ben Shapiro, who recognized Obama's antisemitism during the presidential campaign, writes, in reference to Obama and his handlers allowing Iran free reign with their nuclear program, "America's interest in the Iranian nuclear program has nothing to do with the Israeli-Arab conflict. The Obama administration knows this. They simply don't care. Their position is clear: America's ally, Israel, is no longer valuable. Sacrificing it in order to win Obama global popularity points is a worthwhile pursuit. The Obama administration offers Israel a choice between being a victim of suicide via territorial concessions to the Palestinian Arabs, or a victim of homicide via Iran. And the Obama administration forces that choice so that Obama can smile and wave at cheering throngs of Jew-hating maniacs who populate the Muslim world"*

Shapiro continues: "Yet Obama advocates for territorial concessions by Jews to radical Muslims. He presses Jews to hand over territory not 100 miles from the capital, but constituting half the capital itself. He knows that each time Israel has made territorial concessions, Muslim terrorists have upped the ante - most recently in both Lebanon and the Gaza Strip. And he knows that the Palestinian Arabs have never and will never lay down their arms. Yet he threatens Israel with allowing its nuclear annihilation if Israel refuses to authorize euthanasia"**

Imagine one of those Marxist, Socialist, Communist, tenured college professors that spew left-wingery at impressionable college students and call it an "education" elected to the highest office in the land. Well, that's exactly what happened. Obama served on a board with Rashid Khalidi, a confessed terrorist who has made many anti-Israel statements, including calling its creation a "catastrophe". He is a professor at Columbia University.***
According to militantislammonitor.org, "Barack Obama's connection to radical Islamists such as Rashid Khalidi and Ali Abunimah have received scant media attention. Ali Abunimah, who runs the electronic Intifada website said that he met Obama at many pro-Palestinian events in Chicago. In 1998 Obama and his wife attended a banquet at which the virulently anti-Israel professor Edward Said was the keynote speaker."**** These men also claim, from talking to him personally, that Obama supports and shares their views.


Michelle and Barack supporting and talking with "plagiarist, fabricator, and prominent PLO/Arafat advisor"***** Edward Said.

And then there's Reverend "them Jews won't let me talk to him" Wright. The man who said Louis Farrakhan "epitomized greatness", and traveled together to Libya to meet Qaddafi. The man who put Obama, Farrakhan, and himself on his own "Trumpet" publication. And we're supposed to believe there is absolutely NO ideological synchronicity WHATSOEVER? He sat in those pews for 20 years and forged a close personal relationship with this hatemonger but it was all an innocent accident?
Why did Obama help organize Farrakhan's million man march if he disagrees with him so strongly? Why put forth time and effort to help him? Dare I even mention father Pfleger?

There is more information out there, and more quotes to be repeated emphasizing Obama's anti-Israel, anti-Jewish stance, but this is running a bit long, so I will end by saying SHAME on anyone who purports to call themself Jewish and voted for Obama, a man who is clearly at odds with the ideals of the Jews, who chooses to clearly sympathize with enemies of Jews who would love nothing more than a second holocaust.

*Ben Shapiro, "Barack Obama proves his Anti-Semitism", Townhall.com.
**ibid.
***militantislammonitor.org
****ibid.
*****debbieschlussel.com